Tuesday 16 August 2011

16th August - 1)Kashibai Navale College of Commerce - 'Bhumika' , 2. MMCC - 'Savlya', 3. MITSOM - 'Fulora Foundation'

 )                  Disclaimer : ही संपूर्णपणे माझी वैयक्तिक मते आहेत. नाटकातल्या कलाकारांची आणि प्रेक्षकांची  
                                      मते माझ्यापेक्षा खूप वेगळी असू शकतात. माझी समीक्षणात काही चूक झाल्यास कृपया 
                                      निदर्शनास आणून द्यावी. नाटकांवर चर्चा होणे अपेक्षित आहे - वाद नाही.

                                धन्यवाद !

                  Bhumika Kashibai Navale College of Commerce 

Writer : Digpal Lanjekar        
Characters : Suraj , Roshani, Bhavana ( renowned actress ) writer , director , kumar etc.
 
Story – The play is about a software engineer - Suraj who wants to be an actor. The play begins with a scene in which Suraj gets introduced to a very popular theatre artist – Bhavana ( please correct me if the names are wrong ). Bhavana is a typical actress who underestimates Suraj. She isn’t ready to accept his talent. But the director is very confident about this new chap. As the play progresses , initially Suraj finds the exact dimensions and depths of the characters that he is going to play in the plays and the reason that he gives (about his clarity about the play) is that – the characters somehow meet him one on one and then they reveal the exactness of themselves. Suraj gets a good amount of success initially but at one point the characters stop coming to meet him and tell him the depth and souls of themselves.  Suraj’s wife, director , writer , various characters come and go in between with not much significance attached to themselves. At last Suraj – when he gets blocked at the character called Kumar – he chooses to use gimmicks to hide his inability of finding the depth in his roles. The traditional conflict between usage of these gimmicks and the real soul of the play and its characters is followed by Suraj’s latest success at high profile award ceremony. The person who strikes this debate with him is supposedly the one whom Suraj can’t identify in his last play – i.e. Kumar.   

Property  : Use of masks ( portraying each character)

Lights : Use of blue light to thematically represent his encounter with the characters that he plays.

Set : stage divided into two halves. One is Suraj’s theatre section and other is his home – to be precise balcony in his home.

Music : sounded very loud.

Things to be improved: acting, dialog clarity, music, set etc.  The character of Suraj is supposedly very promising one in the play but he doesn’t seem so.

Overall Rating : 4/10

                 2)  MMCC College of Engineering  - Savalya
Writer : Nachiket Dhavalikar     Director : Piyush Kulkarni
Characters :  Baba, Sakharaam, Maitrin, Mulaga ( doctor ) 

A good attempt. The best play in today’s session – performance wise. 

Story : The play is about an old man – ‘Baba’ who suffers from multiple personality disorder. The play begins with the scene of Baba and his son who is a doctor who treats Baba. Son scolds Baba for  continuously not talking his medication.  The play is divided into three parts – Baba – Son interaction , Baba’s past experiences – i.e. flashback & again Baba-son interaction continued from first scene. The middle part is catchy. In this particular part the mystery  that Baba suffers from such mental disorder gets revealed through his girl friend. She tells Sangram ( the young Baba ) that there is no one called Sadashiv and while doing damage to the so called powerful woman he has unknowingly murdered his own mother. She tells him that the character of Sadashiv is not the real one but just his imagination rather everything around him is his imagination.  But some time later while listening to her,  Sangram ( young baba ) comes to know that his girl friend is also an imaginary character. This is the so called twist in the play. In the last part – baba tells his son that – “Everything is a matter of choice. I might have created these imaginary characters but they are going to surround me all the time - forever. Your medication is not going to fill-up his emptiness or loneliness.”
Everyone played their characters well.  But still acting can be improved a lot. 

Lights : Use of blue and red light to portray Sadashiv and girl friend was good one. The play started with left section illuminated with complete red light while right section in which baba’s son stands is illuminated with yellow lights which according to me symbolises the imaginary reality created by Baba – and the actual reality. 

Set : Use of two windows used at the end to symbolize Sadashiv and baba’s girl friend. Again two different colours were used here – red on Sadashiv – and blue on her. Baba shutting down red lighted window of Sadashiv at the end goes in hand with his dialog – “Everything is a matter of choice. ”  

Music : Sounds became music – which was a good point in the play.  But the music was very loud. The music operation could have been better. But still – well thought music.
Dialog :  Baba to his Son – प्रकाशाची दिशा बदलते तश्या सावल्या बदलतात. अरे मग बदला ना दिशा प्रकाशाची - बदला.

Points that can be improved :
1)      Acting
2)      Music operation
3)      Throughout the play – the silence could have played a very vital role in the play. The silence was missing throughout. Baba’s brooding could have been brought out through this very haunting silence. The extra usage of music and lots of dialogs killed this silence.
4)      The protagonist’s character could have been portrayed through the set. Only his imaginary characters were portrayed through the set by the use of windows. The incorporation of the name of the play could be brought out of the theatrical wall to the audience by using the set which had the optimum imagery associated with it.   
5)      After first revelation of the mystery – the remaining mystery doesn’t remain a mystery. It becomes very predictable. 

Overall Rating  :  5.5 / 10
 

3) MITSOM - 'Fulora Foundation' 
    Writer - Director --> Devesh Kamat 

Characters : Samir Deshpande , Prachi, the boy and the girl who are twins, Samir's wife.

Story : Samir's life becomes miserable after marriage. He meets Prachi with whom he gets connected so well that he has an affair with her. Prachi conceives and then the real encounter with the responsibilities and the identities occurs. Samir is not ready to get married with Prachi. Prachi wants her right of becoming a wife of Sameer and mother of her children. She need a legal identity. After pregnancy - Prachi leaves her children in the hospital and runs away from her children's existence.

In the later part - both Prachi and Sameer come to "Fulora Anathashram" to see their children. The officer there - first rejects and then admits to bring the twins to them. At the end - the children reject to go with their parents.

Music : Good. But can be improved by using various sounds related to Garbha.

Set : Use of womb / Garbha is innovative. The colour scheme there is all red and the womb is illuminated by the red colored zero-bulbs. The right to left movements of the characters are sometimes unnecessary. The two bean-bags at the center portray the inertial adamant nature of both - Sameer and Prachi. ( Don't know whether these two bean-bags are kept there with the same thought in the director's mind. )

Costumes : Use of white colored dress for twins.    


A subtle play with moderate acting. Silences are worked out to some extent.

नाटकाचा शेवट : पालक असूनही अनाथ असणे ह्यातले दुख्ख परिणामकारकपणे बाहेर आणण्यात दिग्दर्शक काही प्रमाणात यशस्वी झाला आहे .

Overall Rating : 5- 5.5

13 comments:

  1. Thanks a lot for the reviews...

    ReplyDelete
  2. hey thanx alot for reviews.. khup chhan lihilet.

    ReplyDelete
  3. thanks for the detailed reviews having even set and music description..

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi !

    I like the reviews .. just reconsider giving those RATINGS .. I feel it is unfair since it is a competition and there are appointed people to do that .. Although you have placed a disclaimer at the beginning .. I sincerely feel that the reviews may go to any level of depth and detail .. but this rating part, if it can be(even if there is a faintest possibility that they can be)taken as against those by the judges .. should be dropped ..

    Suggestion as a friend / acquaintance .. whatever ..

    PLEASE DO NOT MISUNDERSTAND :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. @ Pradeep sir :
    i feel the 'ratings thing' on such kind of blogs is quite normal ! i understand that the owner of blog is not trying to hijack the position of judges or wants to portray doubt over judges' decisions...the ratings helps the viewers/readers to get a rough overall idea about the possible top rankers and ofcourse, the ratings are liable for discussion !
    good luck girish datar for future work !
    - Aakash Gawali

    ReplyDelete
  6. @ Pradeep

    I second Aakash. The intention is not to challange the judges's decision or have a parallel marking system. The intention is to give the viewer the overall idea about the top 10 - 15 plays in the competition.

    Pradeep dada - you can visit last year's blog about Purushottam 2010 reviews. The same thing has been followed and the response is quite matured.

    http://purushottamkarandak.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete
  7. Girish,
    Totally appreciate your work ....
    Keep Posting ..

    ReplyDelete
  8. Girish... I totally agree with you about "Rating". Keep posting!
    C ya soon :) :)

    ReplyDelete
  9. helo

    kaal 1st don ekankika pahilya.. mala prsnly tya nit dislya nahit n aamchya line madhlya anek lokanacha to issue zala..
    1 - FACE LIGHT CLEAR navata..
    2 - donhi natkanchi light chi concept changali
    hoti but ti pan ajun chan improve hou shakte
    basically
    MMCOE chya play madhe. but good efforts by
    both teams.

    aamhi last line madhe baslelo...

    n good work girish...

    ReplyDelete
  10. An excellent beginning to Purushottam Karandak 2011 and with the reviews with such minute details will be so helpful for everyone. Thanks a lot Girish..

    The ratings not only help the readers get an overall idea of the standings of the play, but they also help the participating teams to see themselves from a neutral point of view on a scale to 10. So kindly continue with the ratings..

    Waiting for the next reviews eagerly!!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Tejas, Lights laavanaaryaani either te floor var adjust kele hote kinvaa set laavanaaryaani khurchya kinva setting material tharalyapeksha maage thevala asaava .. kinvaa asa kaahee tharalach nasaava .. pahilyaa naatakaat eka acting area saathee lights dilech navhate (planmadhe) kinvaa aale naaheet kinvaa actors ni to bhalteekadech kelaa ki kaay asa vaatala .. arthaat teenheemadhe technical improvement laa bharpur vaav aahe.

    Sanhitaa mhanun teenahee sanhitaa baryaapaikee baalbodh vaatalyaa. ek adhik ek barobar don itkach apekshit asava ashyaa ..

    Interestingly .. mala teenahee ekaankikaanmadhe kaahee actors changlyaa enthusiasm kinvaa energy aani talent ashya sagalyaane yukt vaatale paN writers / directors ni ajoon kaam karaayalaa hava, aapali visuals chi kinvaa anubhavaanchee shidoree aankhee jamavaayalaa havee aahe asa prakarshaane jaanavat raahila !

    ReplyDelete
  12. Pradeep dada ,
    yes im with u..
    aaj chya natakanchya wishayee im with girish...

    BUT AJUNHI PURSHOTTAM LA KHARI SURUWAT ZALI NAHIYE ASA WATALA.. BAGHU UDYA KAY HOTAY KHHUP STRONG COLLEGE CHA LOT AAHE..
    ALL THE VERY BEST TO TEAM...

    ReplyDelete
  13. Girish.........

    Marathi made jamla tar lihi na.......

    Reviews must ahet btw!!!!!

    ReplyDelete